Articles by "Supreme-Court-2017"
Twitter Facebook

6:53 pm ,

GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707656

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No. 2068 of 2017 (Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 10700 of 2015). D/d. 5.12.2017.

B. Sunitha - Appellant
Versus
State of Telengana & Anr. - Respondents

For the Appellant :- Baij Nath Patel, Ms. Sweta, Ms. Romila, K. Parameshwar, G. Seshagiri Rao, Advocates.
For the Respondents :- S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Mrityunjai Singh, R. Santhnan Krishnan, Aditya Kr., C.S.N. Mohan Rao, Advocates.

Cases Referred :

C. Manohar v. B.R. Poornima, (2004) Crl.L.J 4436.
In the matter of Mr. G., a Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court, (1955) 1 SCR 490 at 494.
J.S. Vasu v. State of Punjab, (1994) 1 SCC 184.
M/s. Modi Cements Ltd. v. Kuchil Kumar Nandi, (1998) 3 SCC 249.
Mahipal Singh Rana Advocate v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2016) 8 SCC 335.
O.P. Sharma v. State of Punjab, (2011) 6 SCC 86.
R.D. Saxena v. Balram Prasad Sharma, (2000) 7 SCC 264.
R.K. Anand v. Delhi High Court, (2009) 8 SCC 106.
Re: K.L. Gauba, AIR 1954 Bom 478.
Tahil Ram Issardas Sadarangani v. Ramchand Issardas Sadarangani, 1993 Supp. (3) SCC 256.
V.C. Rangadurai v. D. Gopalan, (1979) 1 SCC 308.

JUDGMENT

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. - This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 14th October, 2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad in CRLP No.3526 of 2015, thereby, the High Court declined to quash the proceedings initiated against the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881(`the Act').
Twitter Facebook

7:44 am , ,

GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707651

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.
Writ Petitions (Civil) Nos. 13029 of 1985. D/d. 17.11.2017.

M.C. Mehta - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents

For the Petitioners :- Harish N. Salve, Sr. Advocate (A.C.), Ms. Aparajita Singh, (A.C.), A.D.N. Rao, (A.C.), Siddhartha Chowdhury, (A.C.), Petitioner-In-Person.
For the Respondents :- A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG, S. Wasim A. Qadri, D.L. Chidanand, Ritesh Kumar, Zaid Ali, Saeed Qadri, S.S. Rebello, Ms. Nivedita Nair, Abhisehk Bharadwaj, Jai Dehadrai, Ms. Divya Prakash Pandey, Ajit Yadav, Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Ms. Pallavi Chopra, G.S. Makker, Ajit Yadav, Advocates.
For the CPCB :- Vijay Panjwani, Advocate
For the U.P. :- Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, AAG, Ms. Rachna Gupta, Siddhant S. Malik, Advocates.
For the Haryana :- Anil Grover, AAG, Ms. Noopur Singhal, Satish Kumar, Ajay Bansal, Gaurav Yadav, Sanjay Kr. Visen, Samir Ali Khan, Advocates.
For the Rajasthan :- S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Amit Sharma, Ankit Raj, Ms. Indira Bhakar, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocates.
For the NCT :- Chirag M. Shroff, Ms. Neha Sangwan, B.K. Prasad, M/s. S. Narain, Advocates.
For the Mercedes Benz :- Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv., Akshat Hansaria, Amit K. Mishra, Pavan Bhushan, Ritesh Bajaj, Advocates.

ORDER

Report Nos. 72 and 76
On 13.11.2017, we had reserved orders on various applications filed for recall of the order dated 24.10.2017 regarding the ban on use of furnace oil and pet coke in the States of U.P., Haryana and Rajasthan.
2. Today, the learned ASG has placed before us a decision taken by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change of the Government of India on 15.11.2017 requiring the Central Pollution Control Board to issue a direction under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 to the States of U.P., Haryana and Rajasthan prohibiting any industry, operation or processes using pet coke and furnace oil as fuel with immediate effect until further orders. It is clarified by the learned ASG that this is with respect to entire State and not only NCR region.
Twitter Facebook

4:57 am ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 6450 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 4385 of 2017). D/d. 9.5.2017.

Samir Vidyasagar Bhardwaj - Appellant
Versus
Nandita Samir Bhardwaj - Respondent

For the Appellant :- Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- Udit Gupta, Ravi Kumar Tomar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
R. Banumathi, J. - Leave granted.
2. An order passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition(C) No. 169 of 2017 dated 11.01.2017 wherein the High Court affirmed the interim order passed by the Family Court in and by which the appellant-husband has been directed to remove himself from his own home and not to visit there until the divorce petition is finally decided is under challenge.
Twitter Facebook

5:42 pm , ,

Lawyers’ Strike And Suspension Of Court Work Illegal: SC

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No. 509 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4437 of 2016). D/d. 9.3.2017.

Hussain and Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Union of India - Respondents

With
Criminal Appeal No. 511 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 348 of 2017).
Aasu - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
For the Appellants :- Rauf Rahim and Mohd. Irshad Hanif, Advocates.
For the Respondent :- Sidharth Luthra, ASG. (A.C.), Anoopam N. Prasad, Ali Chaudhary and Rohit K. Singh, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.
Leave granted. Grievance in these appeals is against denial of bail pending trial/appeal where appellants have been in custody for a long period.
Twitter Facebook

7:59 am , ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Dipak Misra and R. Banumathi, JJ.
Criminal Appeal Nos.406-407 of 2017 (@ S.L.P. (Criminal) Nos. 9389-90 of 2016). D/d. 27.2.2017.

Ravada Sasikala - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. - Respondents

For the Appellant :- Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- Guntur Prabhakar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J. - In Chetan Dass v. Kamla Devi, 2001(2) R.C.R.(Civil) 641 : (2001) 4 SCC 250 this Court had observed:-
    "Matrimonial matters are matters of delicate human and emotional relationship. It demands mutual trust, regard, respect, love and affection with sufficient play for reasonable adjustments with the spouse. The relationship has to conform to the social norms as well. ..."
Supreme Court Judgments © 2016. All Rights Reserved.
Visitor no. web stats Powered by HostGator

Puneet Batish Advocate

{facebook#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Adv.Batish} {twitter#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Twitter} {google-plus#http://g8.geekupd8.com/+pb} {pinterest#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Pinterest} {youtube#http://g8.geekupd8.com/YouTube}

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget