Articles by "News-Media"
Twitter Facebook

7:44 am , ,

GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707651

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.
Writ Petitions (Civil) Nos. 13029 of 1985. D/d. 17.11.2017.

M.C. Mehta - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents

For the Petitioners :- Harish N. Salve, Sr. Advocate (A.C.), Ms. Aparajita Singh, (A.C.), A.D.N. Rao, (A.C.), Siddhartha Chowdhury, (A.C.), Petitioner-In-Person.
For the Respondents :- A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG, S. Wasim A. Qadri, D.L. Chidanand, Ritesh Kumar, Zaid Ali, Saeed Qadri, S.S. Rebello, Ms. Nivedita Nair, Abhisehk Bharadwaj, Jai Dehadrai, Ms. Divya Prakash Pandey, Ajit Yadav, Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Ms. Pallavi Chopra, G.S. Makker, Ajit Yadav, Advocates.
For the CPCB :- Vijay Panjwani, Advocate
For the U.P. :- Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, AAG, Ms. Rachna Gupta, Siddhant S. Malik, Advocates.
For the Haryana :- Anil Grover, AAG, Ms. Noopur Singhal, Satish Kumar, Ajay Bansal, Gaurav Yadav, Sanjay Kr. Visen, Samir Ali Khan, Advocates.
For the Rajasthan :- S.S. Shamshery, AAG, Amit Sharma, Ankit Raj, Ms. Indira Bhakar, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocates.
For the NCT :- Chirag M. Shroff, Ms. Neha Sangwan, B.K. Prasad, M/s. S. Narain, Advocates.
For the Mercedes Benz :- Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv., Akshat Hansaria, Amit K. Mishra, Pavan Bhushan, Ritesh Bajaj, Advocates.

ORDER

Report Nos. 72 and 76
On 13.11.2017, we had reserved orders on various applications filed for recall of the order dated 24.10.2017 regarding the ban on use of furnace oil and pet coke in the States of U.P., Haryana and Rajasthan.
2. Today, the learned ASG has placed before us a decision taken by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change of the Government of India on 15.11.2017 requiring the Central Pollution Control Board to issue a direction under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 to the States of U.P., Haryana and Rajasthan prohibiting any industry, operation or processes using pet coke and furnace oil as fuel with immediate effect until further orders. It is clarified by the learned ASG that this is with respect to entire State and not only NCR region.
Twitter Facebook

4:19 am ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Ranjan Gogoi and N.V. Ramana, JJ.
Civil Appeal Nos. 10245 of 2014. D/d. 23.11.2016.

Relx India Pvt Ltd. and Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Eastern Book Company and Ors. - Respondents

ORDER
After hearing the learned counsels for the parties the appeal is disposed of with the following directions:
Twitter Facebook

4:53 pm 3 , , , ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- T.S. Thakur and R. Banumathi, JJ.
Crl. M.P. No. 16086 of 1997 in Crl. M.P. No. 4201 of 1997. D/d. 24.7.2015.

Dilip K. Basu - Petitioner
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors. - Respondents

With
Crl. M.P. No. 4201 of 1997, 4105 of 1999, 2600 of 2000, 2601 of 2000, 480 of 2001, 3965, 10385 of 2002, 12704 of 2001, 19694 of 2010 in Crl. M.P. No. 4201 of 1997, Crl. M.P. No. 13566 of 2011 in Crl. M.P. No. 16086 of 1997 in Crl. M.P. No. 4201 of 1997, Crl. M.P. No. 15490 of 2014 in Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 539 of 1986.
For the Petitioner :- Ms. Suruchii Aggarwal, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- Suryanarayana Singh, AAG, Sanjay R. Hegde, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Advocates, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, Anip Sachthey, Anil K. Jha, B. Krishna Prasad, G. Prakash, Gopal Singh, Rituraj Biswas, Manish Kumar, Guntur Prabhakar, Ms. Indra Sawhney, Naresh K. Sharma, Pranab Kumar Mullick, Amit Bhandari, Mrs. S. Mullick, Sebat Kumar D., Ms. Sushma Suri, T.C. Sharma, T.V. Ratnam, Pravir Choudhary, K.R. Sasiprabhu, Shreekant N. Terdal, D.S. Mahra, Ranjan Mukherjee, Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Gopal Prasad, Javed Mahmud Rao, Abhijit Sengupta, Jayesh Gaurav, Ratan Kumar Choudhuri, Ms. Bina Madhavan, (For M/s Corporate Law Group) C.D. Singh, Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, P.V. Yogeswaran, P.V. Dinesh, Shibashish Misra, Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, T. Harish Kumar, Manish Kumar Saran, Anuvrat Sharma, Balaji Srinivasan, Ajay Pal, Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Sunil Fernandes, K.V. Jagdishvaran, Ms. G. Indira, M. Yogesh Kanna, Jayant Patel, Chandra Prakash, Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Ashok Kumar Singh, Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Edward Belho, Amit Kumar Singh, Ms. A. Subhashini, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
T.S. Thakur, J. - In D.K. Basu etc. v. State of West Bengal etc., 1997(1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 372 : (1997) 1 SCC 416 [D.K. Basu, (1997) 1 SCC 416] this Court lamented the growing incidence of torture and deaths in police custody.
Twitter Facebook

5:39 am , ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Dipak Misra and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
I.A. No.12 of 2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 2456 of 2007 D/d. 4.10.2016.

State of Tamil Nadu - Appellants
Versus
State of Karnataka & Ors. - Respondents

For the Appellants :- Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv., Subramonium Prasad, Sr. Adv., G. Umapathi, C. Paranasivam, B. Balaji, Advocates.
For the Respondents :- Fali S. Nariman, Sr. Adv., Anil B. Divan, Sr. Adv., M.R. Naik, Adv. Gen., Mohan V. Katarki, S.C. Sharma, V.N. Raghupathy, R.S. Ravi, J.M. Gangadhar, Ranvir Singh, Mukul Rohatgi, A.G., Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Wasim A. Qadri, Balender Shekhar, Ansh Singh Luthra, Ms. Snidha Mehra, Karan Seth, Zaid Ali, Ansh Singh Luthra, Ms. Kritika Sachdeva, D.S. Mahra, Ms. Diksha Rai, A.S. Nambiar, Sr.
Twitter Facebook

12:45 am , , , ,

He could make the remarks in exercise of his right under Article 19(a) of Constitution, But right to speech does not include a right to immunity from criticism

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- T.S. Thakur CJI, R. Banumathi and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 504 of 2015. D/d. 15.12.2016.

Justice (Retd.) Markandey Katju - Petitioner
Versus
The Lok Sabha & Anr. - Respondents

For the Petitioner :- Shadan Farasat, Talha Abdul Rehman, Ms. Anusha Ramesh, Zulnoor Ahmed, Arjun Harkaull, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
Uday Umesh Lalit J. - This petition under Article 32 seeks quashing of Resolution dated 11.03.2015 passed by Rajya Sabha and Resolution dated 12.03.2015 passed by Lok Sabha. In the alternative, it is also prayed that the Houses of Parliament be directed to give to the petitioner post decisional hearing.
2. On 10.03.2015, the petitioner, a former Judge of this Court published a post on his Facebook Page in respect of Mahatma Gandhi, Father of the Nation. The post was entitled "Gandhi - A British Agent" and stated that Mahatma Gandhi did great harm to India. On the same date, another post was published by the petitioner on his Facebook Page in respect of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose referring to him as an agent of Japanese fascism.
Twitter Facebook

11:09 pm , , ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- T.S. Thakur CJI, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.
Civil Appeal Nos. 717 of 2006. D/d. 14.12.2016.

Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan High Court & Ors - Respondent

With
T.P.(C) No. 75 of 2012.
For the Appellant :- Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- MS. Sushma Suri, Advocate.

JUDGMENT
Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, J. - A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court by its judgment dated 13 May 2005 issued a direction to the Union Government and to its Secretaries in the Ministries of Civil Aviation and Home Affairs "to include the Chief Justices and the judges of the High Court in the list of persons exempted from pre-embarkation security checks" at airports and to amend a circular dated 1 May 2002[1*] of the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS).
Twitter Facebook

7:24 pm , , ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- B.N. Agrawal, G.S. Singhvi and Aftab Alam, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No. 1393 of 2008. D/d. 29.07.2009.

R.K. Anand - Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Delhi High Court - Respondent

With Criminal Appeal No. 1451 of 2008
I.U. Khan - Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Delhi High Court - Respondent
For the Appellant :- Mr. Altaf Ahmed, learned Senior Advocate and Mr. P.P. Rao, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate.
For the Respondent :- Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Senior Advocate and Mr. Nageshwar Rao, Senior Advocate with Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Advocate.
For the NDTV :- Mr. Harish Salve, learned Senior Advocate.

JUDGMENT
Aftab Alam, J. - The present is a fall out from a criminal trial arising from a hit and run accident on a cold winter morning in Delhi in which a car travelling at reckless speed crashed through a police check post and crushed to death six people
Supreme Court Judgments © 2016. All Rights Reserved.
Visitor no. web stats Powered by HostGator

Puneet Batish Advocate

{facebook#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Adv.Batish} {twitter#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Twitter} {google-plus#http://g8.geekupd8.com/+pb} {pinterest#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Pinterest} {youtube#http://g8.geekupd8.com/YouTube}

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget