Court can permit party calling a witness to put questions in the nature of cross-examination at the stage of re-examination
GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707655
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Before :- K. Subba Rao, K.C. Das Gupta and Raghubar Dayal, JJ.Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 1962. D/d. 19.3.1964.
Dahyabhai Chhaganbhai Thakkar - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
For the Appellant :- Mr. B.K. Banerjee, Amicus Curiae.For the Respondent :- Mr. D. R. Prem, Senior Advocate, M/s. R.H. Dhebar and B. R.G.K. Achar, Advocates.
Cases Referred :
K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, (1962) Supp (1) SCR 567.Kamla Singh v. State, AIR 1955 Patna 209.
Ramhitram v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1956 Nagpur 187.
H. M. Advocate v. Fraser (1878) 4 Couper 70.
Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P., (1959) Supp (2) SCR 875 at p. 903.
JUDGMENT
Subba Rao, J. - This appeal raises the question of the defence of insanity for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal code.
