Articles by "Civil-Appeals"
Twitter Facebook

4:57 am ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 6450 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 4385 of 2017). D/d. 9.5.2017.

Samir Vidyasagar Bhardwaj - Appellant
Versus
Nandita Samir Bhardwaj - Respondent

For the Appellant :- Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- Udit Gupta, Ravi Kumar Tomar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
R. Banumathi, J. - Leave granted.
2. An order passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition(C) No. 169 of 2017 dated 11.01.2017 wherein the High Court affirmed the interim order passed by the Family Court in and by which the appellant-husband has been directed to remove himself from his own home and not to visit there until the divorce petition is finally decided is under challenge.
Twitter Facebook

5:03 am ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- S.B. Sinha and P.K. Balasubramanyan, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 3185 of 2006 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 13231 of 2003). D/d. 28.7.2006

Firdous Omer (D) By Lrs. and others - Appellants
Versus
Bankim Chandra Daw (D) by Lrs. and others - Respondents

For the Appellants :- Sarla Chandra, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- P.K. Das, Sr. Advocate, P.N. Mullick, Raja Chatterjee, Sachin Das, Rajni Bhagat, G.S. Chatterjee, Ranjan Mukherjee, Partha Sil, Sanjiv Saxena and Ghanshyam Joshi, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
P.K. Balasubramanyan, J. - Leave granted.
1. The original plaintiff, Sheikh Mohammad Omer, the predecessor-in-interest of the appellants herein, filed the suit C.S. No. 145 of 1983 in the High Court of Calcutta praying for a declaration that he was a valid and lawful tenant in respect of the plaint schedule premises and indicated in the plan annexed to the plaint, for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants
Twitter Facebook

5:39 am , ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- Dipak Misra and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
I.A. No.12 of 2016 in Civil Appeal No(s). 2456 of 2007 D/d. 4.10.2016.

State of Tamil Nadu - Appellants
Versus
State of Karnataka & Ors. - Respondents

For the Appellants :- Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv., Subramonium Prasad, Sr. Adv., G. Umapathi, C. Paranasivam, B. Balaji, Advocates.
For the Respondents :- Fali S. Nariman, Sr. Adv., Anil B. Divan, Sr. Adv., M.R. Naik, Adv. Gen., Mohan V. Katarki, S.C. Sharma, V.N. Raghupathy, R.S. Ravi, J.M. Gangadhar, Ranvir Singh, Mukul Rohatgi, A.G., Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG, Wasim A. Qadri, Balender Shekhar, Ansh Singh Luthra, Ms. Snidha Mehra, Karan Seth, Zaid Ali, Ansh Singh Luthra, Ms. Kritika Sachdeva, D.S. Mahra, Ms. Diksha Rai, A.S. Nambiar, Sr.
Twitter Facebook

11:09 pm , , ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- T.S. Thakur CJI, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ.
Civil Appeal Nos. 717 of 2006. D/d. 14.12.2016.

Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan High Court & Ors - Respondent

With
T.P.(C) No. 75 of 2012.
For the Appellant :- Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- MS. Sushma Suri, Advocate.

JUDGMENT
Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, J. - A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court by its judgment dated 13 May 2005 issued a direction to the Union Government and to its Secretaries in the Ministries of Civil Aviation and Home Affairs "to include the Chief Justices and the judges of the High Court in the list of persons exempted from pre-embarkation security checks" at airports and to amend a circular dated 1 May 2002[1*] of the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS).
Twitter Facebook

10:45 pm ,

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before :- T.S. Thakur CJI, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and L Nageswara Rao, JJ.
Civil Appeal Nos .12164-12166 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (C) Nos.14911-14913 of 2013). D/d. 15.12.2016.

The State of Tamilnadu Rep. By Its Secretary Home, Prohobition & Excise Dept & Ors - Appellants
Versus
K Balu & Anr - Respondents

With
Civil Appeal No. 12167 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (C)no.8267 of 2014), Civil Appeal Nos. 12168 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP(C) No.8971 of 2014), Civil Appeal No. 12169 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (C) No. 35454 of 2014), Civil Appeal No.12170 of 2016 (S.L.P.(C) No.36787 of 2016 @ of CC No.231 of 2015), Civil Appeal Nos. 12171-12172 of 2016 (S.L.P.(C) Nos.36788-36789 of 2016 @ of CC Nos.18587-18588 of 2015), Civil Appeal No.12173 of 2016 (Arising Out of SLP(C) No.34525 of 2015) and T.P.(C) No.739-741 of 2016.
For the Appellants :- Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv., B. Balaji, Muthuvel Palani, A. Arvind Athithan, Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Sanjay Kumar Visen, B.S. Gautam, S.H. Sachdeva, R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv.,V. G. Pragasam, S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Nidesh Gupta, Sr. Adv., V. Balaji, T. Ashok Kumar, Atul Sharma, C. Kannan, Rakesh K. Sharma, Ravi Kamal Gupta, Nikunj Dayal, pramod Dayal, Ms. Payal Dayal, Yadav Narender Singh, Rajshekhar Rao, Abhinav Mukerji, Sameer Dawar, Advocates.
For the Respondents :- Nidesh Gupta, Sr. Adv., V. Balaji, T. Ashok Kumar, Atul Sharma, C. Kannan, Rakesh K. Sharma, Sunil Fernandes, Ms. Astha Sharma, Ms Mithu Jain, Puneeth K.G., Arnav Vidyarthi, Manoj V. George, Ms Shilpa M. George, Yash Sampat, Towseef Ahmad Dar, Kamlendra Mishra, P. Ramesh, S. Thananjayan, D.S. Mahra, Kunal Verma, (M/s. M.V. Kini & Associates), Ms. Sunita Sharma, Ritesh Khatri, Anil Kumar Tandale, Ms. Sunita Sharma, Sanjay Jain, R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv., V.G. Pragasam, S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, V.K. Biju, Ria Sachthey, Vipin Nair, Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. - Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
Supreme Court Judgments © 2016. All Rights Reserved.
Visitor no. web stats Powered by HostGator

Puneet Batish Advocate

{facebook#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Adv.Batish} {twitter#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Twitter} {google-plus#http://g8.geekupd8.com/+pb} {pinterest#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Pinterest} {youtube#http://g8.geekupd8.com/YouTube}

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget